AW: To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)

AW: To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)

[Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)]

> And for you!  You tried to alter my definition to "+Right was 
> defined as a numeric_literal".  Which shows that you can make 
> mistakes as well. But have you owned up it it?

This was no mistake, it was deliberate :-) my boy.


Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Donauwoerth
Registergericht/Registration Court: Amtsgericht Augsburg HRB 16508
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Lutz Bertling
Geschaeftsfuehrung/Board of Management:
Dr. Wolfgang Schoder, Vorsitzender/CEO; Friedrich-Wilhelm Hormel; Ralf Barnscheidt

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

This communication and the information it contains is intended for the addressee(s) named above and for no other persons or organizations. It is confidential and may be legally privileged and protected by law. The unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of this communication or any part of it is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
If you have received this communication in error, kindly notify us by return e-mail and discard and/or delete the communication. Thank you very much. 
It is possible for e-mails to be intercepted or affected by viruses. Whilst we maintain virus checks on our e-mails, we accept no liability for viruses or other material which might be introduced with this message. 

To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)

[anon]

Even though I made a mistake about the parentheses. My BNF reading 
was correct. I did cut the BNF definitions to valid statements and 
opions only. So, you need to reread my post. 

I said:

Ada LRM 4.4 ( 7 ) =>   primary ::= numeric_literal | .. | (expression)

  +Right  => is defined as an expression
  -7      => is defined as an expression

-- ---------------------------- --
-- For other statements see other post --
-- ---------------------------- --

Ada LRM 4.4 ( 7 ) =>   primary ::= numeric_literal | string_literal 

  Right  => string_literal 
  7      => numeric_literal


So, where did I claim that "+Right" was a numeric literal?  I do not 
see that.  I define the "+Right" as an expression and then later 
define "Right" as a string_literal.  which is correct except that the
expression definition requires parentheses.




In <mailman.15.1185946484.3834.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>, "Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)" <Christoph.Grein@eurocopter.com> writes:
>Oh anon boy, no need to shout! Better learn to read BNF.
>
>> That Denote This is a GNAT COMPILER ERROR!
>
>  +Left & +Right;
>
>simple_expression ::= [unary_adding_operator]
>                      term 
>                      {binary_adding_operator term}
>
>       +      => is the unary, 
>       Left   => is a Term,
>       &      => binary_adding_operator 
>       +Right => So this must be a term to make the thing legal
>
>term ::= factor {multiplying_operator factor}
>
>So +Right must be a factor
>
>factor ::= primary
>
>So +Right must be a primary
>
>primary ::= numeric_literal | (expression)
>
>So you claim +Right is a numeric literal - interesting
>
>
>Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH
>Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Donauwoerth
>Registergericht/Registration Court: Amtsgericht Augsburg HRB 16508
>Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Lutz Bertling
>Geschaeftsfuehrung/Board of Management:
>Dr. Wolfgang Schoder, Vorsitzender/CEO; Friedrich-Wilhelm Hormel; Ralf Barnscheidt
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 
>
>This communication and the information it contains is intended for the addressee(s) named above and for no other persons or organizations. It is confidential and may be legally privileged and protected by law. The unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of this communication or any part of it is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
>If you have received this communication in error, kindly notify us by return e-mail and discard and/or delete the communication. Thank you very much. 
>It is possible for e-mails to be intercepted or affected by viruses. Whilst we maintain virus checks on our e-mails, we accept no liability for viruses or other material which might be introduced with this message. 
>

AW: To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)

[Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)]

Anon,

You seem to have a dogmatic attitude. You *did* make a mistake in
reading BNF - you omitted the (). So since +Right has no opening par.,
this cannot be an expression, as you've learned by now.

There were several posts correcting your claim that there is a compiler
bug, but you insisted.

> Even though I made a mistake about the parentheses. My BNF reading 
> was correct. I did cut the BNF definitions to valid statements and 
> opions only. So, you need to reread my post.


Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH
Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Donauwoerth
Registergericht/Registration Court: Amtsgericht Augsburg HRB 16508
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Lutz Bertling
Geschaeftsfuehrung/Board of Management:
Dr. Wolfgang Schoder, Vorsitzender/CEO; Friedrich-Wilhelm Hormel; Ralf Barnscheidt

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

This communication and the information it contains is intended for the addressee(s) named above and for no other persons or organizations. It is confidential and may be legally privileged and protected by law. The unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of this communication or any part of it is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
If you have received this communication in error, kindly notify us by return e-mail and discard and/or delete the communication. Thank you very much. 
It is possible for e-mails to be intercepted or affected by viruses. Whilst we maintain virus checks on our e-mails, we accept no liability for viruses or other material which might be introduced with this message. 

Re: AW: To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)

[anon]

In <mailman.16.1185952313.3834.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>, "Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)" <Christoph.Grein@eurocopter.com> writes:
>Anon,
>
>You seem to have a dogmatic attitude. 

        -- --------------------------- --
        --  True programmers are that way!  --
        -- --------------------------- --

>
>There were several posts correcting your claim that there is a compiler
>bug, but you insisted.
>

Did they, now! What I saw was opions with a few agumenting that it 
should be legal or others trying to alter the Ada definitions. The post 
about have "++++++" or something in c/c++ like that.  Not looking at 
the posting at the movement. They did this instead of giving the 
correct answer which is not very constructive to others is it.

        -- ---------------------------------------- --
        --  I did not see the True RM rule aka RM 4.4 ( 7 )  --
        --  with it example RM 4.5 ( 17 ) until I happen to  --
        -- see it.  Looking for something else.                --
        -- ---------------------------------------- --

And for you!  You tried to alter my definition to "+Right was 
defined as a numeric_literal".  Which shows that you can make 
mistakes as well. But have you owned up it it?



>> Even though I made a mistake about the parentheses. My BNF reading 
>> was correct. I did cut the BNF definitions to valid statements and 
>> opions only. So, you need to reread my post.
>
>
>Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH
>Sitz der Gesellschaft/Registered Office: Donauwoerth
>Registergericht/Registration Court: Amtsgericht Augsburg HRB 16508
>Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates/Chairman of the Supervisory Board: Dr. Lutz Bertling
>Geschaeftsfuehrung/Board of Management:
>Dr. Wolfgang Schoder, Vorsitzender/CEO; Friedrich-Wilhelm Hormel; Ralf Barnscheidt
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 
>
>This communication and the information it contains is intended for the addressee(s) named above and for no other persons or organizations. It is confidential and may be legally privileged and protected by law. The unauthorized use, copying or disclosure of this communication or any part of it is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
>If you have received this communication in error, kindly notify us by return e-mail and discard and/or delete the communication. Thank you very much. 
>It is possible for e-mails to be intercepted or affected by viruses. Whilst we maintain virus checks on our e-mails, we accept no liability for viruses or other material which might be introduced with this message. 
>

Re: AW: To := Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)

[Markus E.L. 2]

'Colossus DOT Pike AT worldnet DOT att DOT net (anon)' wrote:

> In <mailman.16.1185952313.3834.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>, "Grein, Christoph (Fa. ESG)" <Christoph.Grein@eurocopter.com> writes:
>>Anon,
>>
>>You seem to have a dogmatic attitude. 
>
>         -- --------------------------- --
>         --  True programmers are that way!  --
>         -- --------------------------- --

True programmers aren't that way. True programmers go with the flow.


>>There were several posts correcting your claim that there is a compiler
>>bug, but you insisted.
>>
>
> Did they, now! What I saw was opions with a few agumenting that it 
> should be legal or others trying to alter the Ada definitions. The post 

Actually you saw at least two references to the ARM with proof that
your assertions where wrong.

>         --  I did not see the True RM rule aka RM 4.4 ( 7 )  --
>         --  with it example RM 4.5 ( 17 ) until I happen to  --

The examples are certainly instructive, but my idea is that they
aren't normative. So I wouldn't rely on the examples (without
understanding which rule apply to them).

Regards -- Markus