From: Per Sandberg <per.sandberg@bredband.net>
Cc: david@botton.com, comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org, jcreem@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Evaluation of Ada-compilers and IDE:s
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 20:59:59 +0100
Date: 2004-12-11T20:59:59+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.186.1102795250.10401.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41B35444.3040106@bredband.net>
Thanks for your input,
But to make a long story short:
I am currently running GNAT and ObjectAda and got a personal view on
which one is the best to use in production, and was wondering if there
was anyone havinge other experiences.
I have been running the old Rational R1000 Ada machines (and that is
still the best Ada(83) environment in the world, the only problem is
that CPU-power and memory sucks) and from that iI have taken the
transision from to APEX under AIX (that environment was scraped in the
mid 90:s).
Currently I am running ObejctAda and GNAT and what I want to know is if
ther is any comparison of recent date between Aonix ObjectAda and GNAT.
I think APEX is out of the question since Rational has sent out an end
of life warning on APEX (they maybe changed their mind but in my eys
their messege was clear and their website does not push for Ada).
/Per Sandberg
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-11 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <41B35444.3040106@bredband.net>
2004-12-11 19:59 ` Per Sandberg [this message]
2004-12-11 23:56 ` Evaluation of Ada-compilers and IDE:s Jeff C r e e.m
2004-12-13 19:34 ` Arthur Schwarz
2004-12-13 19:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-12-13 20:49 ` Pascal Obry
2004-12-05 18:32 Per Sandberg
2004-12-05 22:17 ` Jeff C r e e.m
2004-12-06 15:06 ` David Botton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox