Re: Ada Component Registry proposal

[sk <noname@myob.com>]

MDC :
 > Not unless you'd freeze "Adaxx" and add only new stuff to
 > "Adayy" - and I ...

Again I am not going to argue for "Adaxx" and as I have said,
I have no vested interest one way or another and the idea was
not intended as a version control.

 From RI Eachus' discussion concerning the standards, and the
statement "But the current standard really is Ada 2000,", it
would suggest that the current "Ada.*", "Interfaces.*" etc are
not frozen either and there is absolutely nothing to prevent
vendors from silently implementing an AI update.

I am *almost* tempted to do "diffs" on all of the GNAT supplied
"Ada.*", "Interfaces.*" for 3,13p and 3.15p, both of which are
for Ada'95, to see if there are specification changes to meet AI
requirements.

... and again, this issue would occurr no matter what the "root"
package was called.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------
-- Merge vertically for real address
--
--     s n p @ t . o
--      k i e k c c m
-------------------------------------------------