From: "Grein, Christoph" <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Subject: Re: Intermixing two storage pools
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:35:44 +0100 (MET)
Date: 2003-01-22T11:35:44+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.15.1043232179.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
> In article <mailman.11.1043222919.4961.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>,
> "Grein, Christoph" <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com> writes:
> >> I have to user-defined storage pools.
> >>
> >> Is it OK to allocate ("new") by one of them and deallocate by the other
> >> ("Uncheked_Deallocation"), using conversions between access types.
> >
> > No, as far as I know that's even erroneous. You must deallocated from the
same
> > pool you allocated it.
>
> Are you sure, which item of Standard deprecates this?
This is not just a deprecation. See RM 13.11.2(16). It's erroneous, aka Nasal
Demons effect.
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-22 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-22 10:35 Grein, Christoph [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-22 8:01 Intermixing two storage pools Grein, Christoph
2003-01-22 8:42 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-22 16:52 ` Robert A Duff
2003-01-22 20:29 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-22 7:42 Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox