[Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]

[Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]

[Marius Amado Alves]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 40 bytes --]

(Ada-France PLEASE set Reply-To field!)

[-- Attachment #2: Forwarded message - Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada --]
[-- Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1401 bytes --]

From: Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt>
To: Stephane Richard <stephane.richard@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:33:37 +0000
Message-ID: <1066736017.2801.147.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 01:28, Stephane Richard wrote:
> "Nick Roberts" <nick.roberts@acm.org> wrote in message
> news:bn20as$rl85q$1@ID-25716.news.uni-berlin.de...
> 
> > So would I, but the DSA as it currently stands is suitable only for
> > embedded systems (it has no reflection, security, transaction management,
> > publication, and so on), and the ARG seems to be very reluctant to expand
> > the DSA's role (or separately extend it).
> 
> *** I wonder why.

Because those things (security etc.) are there in actual implementations
e.g. GLADE?

But I understand the desire for a kind of standard extension. If it can
be done inside the language (perhaps with ASIS), then it could be a CAL
branch ;-)

"Keep Ada small, create a big library" could be the internal motto of
the CAL developers.

RE: [Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]

[Lionel.DRAGHI]

| -----Message d'origine-----
| De: Marius Amado Alves [mailto:amado.alves@netcabo.pt]
...
| (Ada-France PLEASE set Reply-To field!)

Are you sure Ada-France maintainers read each message on cla?

Please, forward your message to www@ada-france.org.

-- 
Lionel Draghi

RE: [Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]

[Marius Amado Alves]

On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 12:30, Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
> | (Ada-France PLEASE set Reply-To field!)
> 
> Are you sure Ada-France maintainers read each message on cla?

One can hope ;-)

I have filed the suggestion some time ago with the system admin. I use
the expression here just as an explanation of the forward.

/*
Full explanation. When I want to reply to a CLA post I tend to hit the
reply button. This has the effect of replying only to the original
poster. To reply to CLA I must hit the "Reply to all" button and copy
the address in "Cc" to "To" (a lot of mouse action BTW). When I forget
to do this then I forward the sent message to CLA, prepending the
infamous expression above to explain why I am forwarding and reenforcing
the suggestion to the sysop at the same time.
*/

Re: [Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]

[Preben Randhol]

On 2003-10-21, Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> wrote:
> /*
> Full explanation. When I want to reply to a CLA post I tend to hit the
> reply button. This has the effect of replying only to the original
> poster. To reply to CLA I must hit the "Reply to all" button and copy
> the address in "Cc" to "To" (a lot of mouse action BTW). When I forget
> to do this then I forward the sent message to CLA, prepending the
> infamous expression above to explain why I am forwarding and reenforcing
> the suggestion to the sysop at the same time.
> */

C syntax! *HRMF*

--  If I'm not mistaken I think you can get fetchmail to fix this for you.
--  How do you download your mails?
--  There is a good reason for not setting the Reply To: field in
--  mailinglists, but I have forgotten it now as I use mutt
--  (http://www.mutt.org) and this solves the problem for me.


Preben
-- 
This is Ada95 land. On quiet nights you can hear C programmers debug.

Re: [Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]

[Samuel Tardieu]

>>>>> "Marius" == Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> writes:

Marius> /* Full explanation. When I want to reply to a CLA post I tend
Marius> to hit the reply button. This has the effect of replying only
Marius> to the original poster. To reply to CLA I must hit the "Reply
Marius> to all" button and copy the address in "Cc" to "To" (a lot of
Marius> mouse action BTW). When I forget to do this then I forward the
Marius> sent message to CLA, prepending the infamous expression above
Marius> to explain why I am forwarding and reenforcing the suggestion
Marius> to the sysop at the same time.  */

Do you hope that a request enclosed in a C comment will be acted upon? :)

More seriously, if your mailer is broken and doesn't have a
"reply-to-list" functionality (the two mailers I use, mutt and gnus,
do have this capability), then you should consider using another
one. In those software, "reply" replies to the original poster,
"reply-to-all" replies to everyone and "reply-to-list" replies to the
list only, without adding the original poster.

And no, I won't change the settings, I do not like setting "reply-to"
addresses to mailing-lists for many reasons which would be way
off-topic here. Note that this doesn't harm anyone as it is only a
gateway to the real Usenet group: noone is forced to use it and
everyone can setup another gateway with other settings.

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

Re: [Fwd: Re: Is CORBA dead for Ada]

[Marius Amado Alves]

On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 14:16, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> ... I won't change the settings, I do not like setting "reply-to"
> addresses to mailing-lists for many reasons which would be way
> off-topic here...

You're right. I can imagine the reasons. I guess I was in a selfish mood
before. Sorry. I'll get another email application soon, as advised.