From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@acm.org>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Invalid operator name?
Date: 27 Nov 2004 11:50:24 -0500
Date: 2004-11-27T11:50:24-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.133.1101574275.10401.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IR1qd.68030$Ro.2624307@news20.bellglobal.com>
Sandro Magi <smagi@naasking.homeip.net> writes:
> When I try to define my own operator, I receive an "Invalid operator name"
> error during compilation. I've found references to operator overloading in
> reference materials, but no word whether new operators can be defined which
> leads me to believe that it's not possible.
Right; only the predefined operators may be overloaded. That
simplifies the front end of the Ada parser, and makes it easier for
everyone to read your code.
--
-- Stephe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-27 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-27 16:23 Invalid operator name? Sandro Magi
2004-11-27 16:50 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2004-11-27 19:21 ` Martin Krischik
2004-11-27 21:47 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox