From: Preben Randhol <randhol+cla2@pvv.org>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:03:54 +0200
Date: 2006-07-29T19:05:50+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.12.1154192651.32700.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eafkmo$frp$1@online.de>
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 14:35:35 +0200
Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de> wrote:
> I'd suggest using GMGPL. But this depends on what you want to achieve
> with Qt4Ada:
Does it matter if QT4Ada is GMGPL when QT is GPL? I mean shouldn't
QT4Ada then be dual licensed so that whether one use the QT GPL or
non-GPL version one do not get problems?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-29 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-29 10:34 Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada Yves Bailly
2006-07-29 12:35 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 17:03 ` Preben Randhol [this message]
2006-07-29 17:44 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-29 21:50 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 18:17 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-29 19:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-07-29 14:24 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-31 20:57 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-01 2:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-08-03 7:51 ` Rob Norris
2006-08-01 11:35 ` Philippe Bertin
2006-08-01 21:55 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-05 19:47 ` Steve Whalen
2006-08-05 21:25 ` Michael Bode
2006-08-06 9:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox