From: Marius Amado-Alves <marius@amado-alves.info>
To: comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Subject: Re: Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:24:35 +0100
Date: 2006-07-29T16:25:47+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.11.1154183092.32700.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44cb39a1$0$32184$636a55ce@news.free.fr>
> On the "administrative" side, I have some wonder about licensing.
> Has it's
> only a personal project, I think GPLv2 would be fine. What's your
> opinion?
> I also have plans to release it on SourceForge, necessary step if
> more than
> one person will work on it. Again, any suggestion is appreciated.
Then let me suggest a progressive license (softdevelcoop.org), the
only scheme that makes sense if one wants to balance the right of the
developers and the rights of the users. The SDC site is at the
disposal of all progressive software stakeholders.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-29 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-29 10:34 Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada Yves Bailly
2006-07-29 12:35 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 17:03 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-29 17:44 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-29 21:50 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 18:17 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-29 19:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-07-29 14:24 ` Marius Amado-Alves [this message]
2006-07-31 20:57 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-01 2:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-08-03 7:51 ` Rob Norris
2006-08-01 11:35 ` Philippe Bertin
2006-08-01 21:55 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-05 19:47 ` Steve Whalen
2006-08-05 21:25 ` Michael Bode
2006-08-06 9:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox