Re: GNAT and no runtime

[sk <noname@myob.com>]

JCS <SANS.SPAM@MERCI.FR>:
 > ... <snip>
 >

So, in sumary, you are porting the GNAT run-time ?

The point I am trying to make is that to port a run-time,
you need to know what you are porting it to ! Replacing
each run-time function at a time will probably work, but
why not actually step back and write the kernel/executive to
achieve your goals and then port the GNAT run-time to your
kernel's capabilities ?

 > Even if I disagree with your design, ...

Not "my design", it is how the Intel (>= i386) chips are built.
Why not use the security/ring features of the chip if they are
available ?

 > ...it would be out of topic here.

Discussion of OS written in Ada off topic ? Sorry, I disagree,
the topic seems appropriate to comp.lang.ada


-- 
-------------------------------------------------
-- Merge vertically for real address
--
--     s n p @ t . o
--      k i e k c c m
-------------------------------------------------