Re: GNAT 3.15 - GCC 3.x (Was Re: Format of .adp file).

[sk <noname@myob.com>]

Hi,


"chris.danx" <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
> Isn't a 3.15 (of some sort) already used by companies?  

Sorry, I meant a "p" release ...

> ... Act seem to be concentrating on the gcc 3.xx integration and 
> probably would rather be doing that and keeping their customers happy 
> than prepping' a public release of 3.15 which would soon become outdated 
> by the 3.xx effort ...
> ...
> Aren't they going to be the same? ...
> ...
> Unfortunately not really! ...

I was under similar impressions until someone mentioned a 3.15 release
and I remembered that Ada, as in GCC 3.x, and GNAT are currently
divergent. 

Is there going to be a continued distinction between the ACT GNAT 
releases (private or public) and the Ada gcc front-end ? 

I would assume otherwise, but as noted ...

> ... it's a weird world and you never can be sure of anything.

:-)

...

Has anyone built a gcc list digest to exclusively track the 
Ada/GNAT issues/discussions and be willing to share ?

-- 
-------------------------------------
-- Merge vertically for real address
-------------------------------------
s n p @ t . o
 k i e k c c m
-------------------------------------