Re: Style: always declare subrountines?

[sk <noname@myob.com>]

Hi,

porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton)
> You misunderstood. I'm about the case when one has forgotten
> to write the definition of the "public procedure", but
> written in the body a "private procedure" with the same
> specification.

I do misunderstand and I am having a difficult time
imagining how the situation would occurr ...

Either you want to make a private procedure public ?
... then simply put the spec in the package spec and
obviously not what you are talking about.

Or you want two subroutines, possibly unrelated, 
one public and one private, to operate on the same 
data types etc, with the same name ?
... I would tend to do a rethink at this stage and
change data abstractions and modeling.



-- 
-------------------------------------
-- Merge vertically for real address
-------------------------------------
s n p @ t . o
 k i e k c c m
-------------------------------------