comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
Subject: Re: is exception when others => null; smart?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:25:04 -0500
Date: 2002-10-24T09:25:04-05:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.1035469562.19694.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnarfvcc.4ud.randhol+news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no

Well, essentially what it says is
"If anything bad happens, I don't want to know about it."

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Preben Randhol" <randhol+news@pvv.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Sent: October 24, 2002 9:03 AM
Subject: is exception when others => null; smart?


> Hi
> 
> As Emacs (ugg!) got installed when I had to reinstall Debian due to a
> hard disc crash, I thought I'd have a look at the ada-mode before
> uninstalling Emacs.
> 
> Now I'm in the process of making a ada-mode for vim (currently called:
> am - Ada in the Morning) which will have much of the functionality of
> the ada-mode for Emacs.
> 
> However there is one thing with ada-mode which I don't know is what I
> want:
> 
> If you choose to generate a body for a procedure or a function then you
> get this:
> 
>    procedue Proc
>    is
> 
>    begin
> 
>    exception
>       when others => null;
>    end Proc;
> 
> My question is: Is this smart? I mean won't you then automatically mask
> all the potential problems you might get at run-time so that you won't
> see errors in the code during testing? I can see that it might also have
> advantages, but before I implement this I would like to hear what you
> think.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Preben
> -- 
> Ada95 makes your code less cryptic.
> _______________________________________________
> comp.lang.ada mailing list
> comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada
> 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-24 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-24 14:03 is exception when others => null; smart? Preben Randhol
2002-10-24 14:25 ` David C. Hoos, Sr. [this message]
2002-10-24 14:28   ` Preben Randhol
2002-10-24 14:38 ` Per Sandbergs
2002-10-25 15:04   ` Robert A Duff
2002-10-25 20:41     ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-10-26 23:04       ` Robert A Duff
2002-10-26  7:47     ` tmoran
2002-10-24 16:39 ` Mark Biggar
2002-10-24 20:06   ` Robert A Duff
2002-10-24 20:23     ` Wes Groleau
2002-10-25  1:16       ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-10-25 10:10         ` In case statment? (was Re: is exception when others => null; smart?) Preben Randhol
2002-10-25 14:59           ` Robert A Duff
2002-10-25 15:06             ` Preben Randhol
2002-10-29 18:23             ` Peter Richtmyer
2002-10-30  2:52               ` Steven Deller
2002-10-30  8:58               ` Anders Wirzenius
2002-10-30 19:57                 ` Peter Richtmyer
2002-10-31  7:02                   ` Anders Wirzenius
2002-10-30  9:36               ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2002-10-30 19:44                 ` Peter Richtmyer
2002-10-30 13:28               ` Marin David Condic
2002-10-30 20:34                 ` Robert Spooner
2002-10-31 12:40                   ` In case statment? (was Re: is exception when others => null;smart?) Marin David Condic
2002-10-25 17:13           ` In case statment? <...> when others John Woodruff
2002-10-27 21:03           ` In case statment? (was Re: is exception when others => null; smart?) Ze Administrator
2002-10-28 10:04             ` Preben Randhol
2002-10-28 20:05               ` Wes Groleau
2002-10-30 11:31                 ` Preben Randhol
2002-10-28 12:32             ` In case statment? (was Re: is exception when others => null;smart?) Adrian Hoe
2002-10-24 20:11   ` is exception when others => null; smart? Simon Wright
2002-10-24 21:22     ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-10-24 20:03 ` Robert A Duff
2002-10-25  1:49 ` SteveD
2002-10-25  3:48 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2002-10-26 11:34   ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox