Re: The Dreaded "Missing Subunits"

["Grein, Christoph" <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>]

> Here's a better idea than a file extension convention: Why not have all Ada
> compilers allow the user to specify what the convention is for their
> project? Most of the compilers I've seen have some ability already to store
> configuration or initialization information in some manner. If its a
> command-line compiler (id est, Gnat) it could be a switch set by the IDE or
> there can be some special file for a project that identifies the convention
> as well as other useful initialization & option stuff.

Gnat project files (3.15) to work with Rational file name convention:

File name apex.gpr
------------------
project Apex is

  for Source_Dirs use ();

  package Naming is

    for Casing                        use "lowercase";
    for Dot_Replacement               use ".";
    for Specification_Suffix  ("Ada") use ".1.ada";
    for Implementation_Suffix ("Ada") use ".2.ada";

  end Naming;

end Apex;