Re: Ada2005 temp solo child

[<ica2ph@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de>]

In article <mailman.1031907902.8367.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> you wrote:
>> While developing an application, I have e.g. a parent.child
>> but not yet a parent package, which may or may come later.
>> Now my compiler forces me to have the parent.
>> I would prefer the ada standard would force the compiler
>> to allow parentless children.
>> Did I ignore some important aspect?

> I do not know, but the request seems silly to me. Why is it so disturbing to create a 
> dummy parent, which is still empty. It has to be created anyway eventually, so 
> why not just now? If there will never be a parent, why have the hierarchy at 
> all?

Haetten Sie meine Anfrage genau durchgelesen,
dann haetten Sie mich nicht gleich beleidigen muessen.

-- 
--Peter Hermann(49)0711-685-3611 fax3758 ica2ph@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de
--Pfaffenwaldring 27 Raum 114, D-70569 Stuttgart Uni Computeranwendungen
--http://www.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de/homes/ph/
--Team Ada: "C'mon people let the world begin" (Paul McCartney)