From: sk <noname@myob.com>
Subject: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:58:15 -0500
Date: 2002-04-26T15:58:15-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.1019948342.7875.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
Hi,
I have had time to "revisit" the EduOs-Ada project and
during much needed research run accross RTEMS.
A brief look at the RTEMS specs would suggest that
RTEMS either meets most of the needs discussed in
2 or 3 years (at least) of threads in cla or is
capable of supporting those needs.
I am wondering why the contributors to the said
threads do not regard RTEMS as a suitable OS to
adopt as a platform for playing with ?
Any insights appreciated, thanks.
(RTEMS at => http://www.oarcorp.com/)
--
-------------------------------------
-- Merge vertically for real address
-------------------------------------
s n p @ t . o
k i e k c c m
-------------------------------------
next reply other threads:[~2002-04-26 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-26 20:58 sk [this message]
2002-04-28 7:45 ` An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ? James Ross
2002-04-28 11:18 ` sk
2002-04-28 21:48 ` James Ross
2002-04-28 23:12 ` Nick Roberts
2002-04-29 2:29 ` sk
2002-04-29 5:48 ` James Ross
2002-04-29 12:09 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-30 5:33 ` James Ross
2002-04-30 15:59 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-29 18:52 ` Bytes per character (was Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?) Brian Catlin
2002-04-29 22:15 ` sk
2002-04-29 23:28 ` chris.danx
2002-04-29 22:51 ` sk
2002-04-28 21:13 ` An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ? Nick Roberts
2002-04-29 0:34 ` James Ross
2002-04-29 5:19 ` Simon Wright
2002-04-30 6:53 ` James Ross
2002-04-30 16:03 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-05-01 22:24 ` Simon Wright
2002-04-30 8:49 ` Why not MaRTE was " Alfred Hilscher
2002-04-30 14:08 ` sk
2002-05-07 2:22 ` Nick Roberts
2002-05-12 16:35 ` Freddy
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox