Re: [OT] Gibson's vision of computer languajes

[sk <noname@myob.com>]

Hi,

>In the past few weeks there have been a few threads where the 
>OP never contributed to the thread past the original post 
>(roughly once every two or three weeks).  Huge threads resulted 
>from these, mainly because the post was designed to provoke such 
>an argument, with little accomplished because most ppls minds 
>are made up on the issue in question.  Seems it's all too 
>easy to do.

At least it makes no attempt to claim a relationship to Ada 
and is clearly marked OT for a change :-)

I think cla has done remarkably well so far this year. It 
is already march and the perenial

* Ada vs C ...
* Ada should do it my way ...
* ACT/Aonix etc should do it my way ...

wars havn't broken out yet (holding breath and crosssing 
fingers :-)

Luckily, the "Future with Ada" thread has not escalated 
and actually moved into identifying various "Rosen"
posters.

 o o
  |
 \_/

-- 
-------------------------------------
-- Merge vertically for real address
-------------------------------------
s n p @ t . o
 k i e k c c m
-------------------------------------