Re: ACT announces availability of GNAT 3.14p

[Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>]

On  3/02, Robert Dewar wrote:

| Actually our experience so far is that, at least as a GNAT
| Pro development environment, XP is more stable than NT (I
| am in the process of switching my own development from OS/2
| to XP now, since unfortunately our tools have not continued to be
| developed for OS/2, so it is time to say goodbye to the only *really*
| stable system for the PC that I met so far :-)

Well, it looks like you have not tested FreeBSD then :) PC running a stable
version of FreeBSD do typically have uptimes of hundreds of days.

Last July, you wrote after your signature "(who one of these days will probably
bite the bullet and switch to Linux -- I am beginning to miss some of the
nice GNAT tools that are not available on OS/2 -- anyone know of an
implementation of EPM on Linux :-)". Will you choose Windows XP rather
than Linux?

  Sam