Re: Ada / C++ comparison paper

From: "David C. Hoos" <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com>
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Cc: <hyrosen@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada / C++ comparison paper
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:34:08 -0600
Date: 2001-12-17T16:34:08-06:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.1008628203.17140.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1008626816.690418@master.nyc.kbcfp.com

Agreed that the cited paper is approaching ten years of age --
but would you do the kind service to the community of
pointing out just which are the "typical lies, half-truths, and
drive-by shootings" of which this paper is "full?"

I, for one, do not wish to repeat "typical lies, half-truths,
and drive-by shootings" in my advocacy of Ada.

Thank you, sincerely

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
To: <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: Ada / C++ comparison paper

> "Frode Tenneboe" <ft@alne.edh.ericsson.se> wrote in message
> news:1008601517.470745@edh3...
> >
>
http://www.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de//ifi/ps/AdaBasis/pal_1195/ada/ajpo/fl
> yers/9x-cplus.txt
>
> Just be aware when reading this paper that it's approaching ten years of
> age,
> and is full of the typical lies, half-truths, and drive-by shootings that
> frustrated
> Ada advocates always promulgate against C++.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> comp.lang.ada mailing list
> comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
> http://ada.eu.org/mailman/listinfo/comp.lang.ada
>