From: Michal Nowak <vinnie@inetia.pl>
To: "comp.lang.ada usegroup->mailing list gateway"
<comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Subject: Re: Mine Detector Game
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 00:54:07 +0100
Date: 2001-11-05T00:54:07+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.1004917867.15022.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3BE5C000.F5C23EC4@acm.org>
>Enjoy.
Thanks, I enjoyed it (maybe too long as for the first time :-)).
Especially, when I read, that it never requires guessing,
I started to play with engagement (some years ago when I was
in high school, there was many losses because the player had to
guess). But finally I came to this situation:
_____________________
... | 2 | M |<3>| 1 | 0 |
---------------------
... | 3 | M |<6>| 3 | 1 |
---------------------
... | 3 | M | M | M | 1 |
---------------------
... | 2 | M | 4 | 3 | 2 |
---------------------
..... | M |
... - not important
_____
| M | - cell with marked mine
-----
_____
| 2 | - opened cell
-----
_____
|<3>| - covered cell
-----
Maybe it is too late and I am missing something, but it looks like,
I have to guess. Does this non-guessing feature means that I do not
have to guess on the beginning of the game (that there should always
be covered cell with <0> on the edge)? Right now the only idea of
alghoritm eliminating totally guessing has too high computational
complexity, but maybe it is possible to use some heurestics.
I found that, Auto Mark function sometimes marks incorrect fields.
I'm too sleepy now to analize when, I know only tha it happens.
Anyway, thanks for providing some nice relax.
Mike
-----------------------------------------
____|
\%/ |~~\
O |
o>> Mike Nowak |
T |
/ > vinnie@inetia.pl |
http://www.geocities.com/vinnie14pl _|__
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-04 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-04 22:24 Mine Detector Game Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-04 23:54 ` Michal Nowak [this message]
2001-11-05 6:01 ` Al Christians
2001-11-05 11:46 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-11-05 20:44 ` David Botton
2001-11-05 23:03 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-11-06 2:09 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-06 2:18 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-05 6:02 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-05 8:42 ` Preben Randhol
2001-11-06 2:17 ` Problems with " Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-06 18:02 ` Preben Randhol
2001-11-06 18:49 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-06 19:12 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-07 2:20 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-07 9:04 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-07 10:50 ` Preben Randhol
2001-11-07 14:01 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-07 14:18 ` Preben Randhol
2001-11-08 4:20 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-08 19:52 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-08 20:42 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-08 22:29 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-09 2:06 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-09 14:19 ` Preben Randhol
2001-11-09 17:25 ` Pascal Obry
2001-11-10 4:23 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-10 4:51 ` Ted Dennison
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-11-04 22:23 Jeffrey Carter
2001-11-06 15:34 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox