From: Erlo Haugen <elh@terma.com>
To: "'comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org'" <comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
Subject: FW: Ada 200X
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:13:51 +0200
Date: 2003-06-03T14:13:51+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mailman.1.1054650999.19078.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org> (raw)
-----Original Message-----
From: Gautier Write-only [mailto:gautier@somewhere.nil]
Sent: 3. juni 2003 04:46
To: comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Subject: Re: Ada 200X
And838N@netscape.net wrote:
> I've heard professors say they don't like Ada because it's slow and
> does all those "bounds" checking "things".
>They are misinformed: Ada is slow when the bounds checking is ON. After
some debugging phase, if you want, you can turn all checkings OFF ! And as
you point out, better to have> the possibility of bounds checking than
not... ________________________________________________________
Gautier -- http://www.mysunrise.ch/users/gdm/gsoft.htm
NB: For a direct answer, e-mail address on the Web site!
<
Wouldn't
subtype day_number is natural range 1..31;
type month_days is array (day_number) of some_other_type;
eliminate the boundschecking??
Erlo Haugen
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-03 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-03 12:13 Erlo Haugen [this message]
2003-06-03 14:49 ` FW: Ada 200X Preben Randhol
2003-06-03 14:55 ` John R. Strohm
2003-06-03 15:16 ` Vinzent Hoefler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox