From: "Michael B." <michaelb@example.com>
Subject: Re: Question about name resolution
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 19:25:06 +0100
Date: 2015-01-21T19:25:06+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m9oqtt$hn3$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccegqpb315.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
On 01/20/15 21:39, Robert A Duff wrote:
> This rule is followed in the Annotated version by 25 paragraphs of
> explanatory text! See AARM-8.3(26.a-26.k). And several AI's were
> needed to fix bugs in this rule.
>
> I challenge you to provide wording that would forbid your case,
> and cases like it. ;-) A modification or addition to 8.3(26),
> I mean. It's not easy!
I give up ;-) Since I never came across this problem before, the current
rules seem to be quite okay...
And thank you for the explanation.
Regards,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-21 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 18:47 Question about name resolution Michael B.
2015-01-20 19:00 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-01-20 19:32 ` Michael B.
2015-01-20 20:39 ` Robert A Duff
2015-01-21 18:25 ` Michael B. [this message]
2015-01-21 0:47 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-01-21 10:54 ` Brian Drummond
2015-01-20 19:43 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox