From: "Michael B." <michaelb@example.com>
Subject: Re: Question about name resolution
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:32:51 +0100
Date: 2015-01-20T20:32:51+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m9magv$a8e$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m9m8jj$1l7$1@dont-email.me
On 01/20/15 20:00, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> There's no way to call the 1st P by the name P. You could rename it and call it
> by the renamed name.
It works, thank you!
I found something similar in a library that I want to use.
I was surprised that this compiles without warnings if neither of the
procedures is called. Why is such overloading allowed in Ada? It seems
to make no sense to write a procedure that cannot be called directly.
Regards,
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 18:47 Question about name resolution Michael B.
2015-01-20 19:00 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-01-20 19:32 ` Michael B. [this message]
2015-01-20 20:39 ` Robert A Duff
2015-01-21 18:25 ` Michael B.
2015-01-21 0:47 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-01-21 10:54 ` Brian Drummond
2015-01-20 19:43 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox