From: "Markus Schöpflin" <no.spam@spam.spam>
Subject: Re: Surprising behaviour of strings.fixed.overwrite
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:56:07 +0100
Date: 2014-11-13T13:56:07+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m429p5$tsq$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ly61ejl1dm.fsf@pushface.org
Am 13.11.2014 um 13:40 schrieb Simon Wright:
> Markus Schöpflin <no.spam@spam.spam> writes:
>
>> But by now I think I'm better off creating my own set of functions and
>> procedures which just do what I need, as it turns out that the
>> standard implementation is rather slow, anyway.
>
> No issue with creating your own subprograms, but GNAT's implementation
> isn't the standard (the Standard contains no implementation, after all).
>
Sorry, what I wanted to say is that GNAT's implementation of the standard is
rather slow in this case.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-13 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-12 10:49 Surprising behaviour of strings.fixed.overwrite Markus Schöpflin
2014-11-12 12:55 ` G.B.
2014-11-12 15:49 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-11-12 23:19 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-11-13 8:15 ` Markus Schöpflin
2014-11-13 12:40 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-13 12:56 ` Markus Schöpflin [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox