From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: EMACS Ada Mode Maintenance
Date: 1999/02/07
Date: 1999-02-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3zp6q4jp0.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 79fmss$g45$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
dewar@gnat.com writes:
> But as I said in my last note, in practice, overall, I
> think everyone, even those not using GNAT, will find that
> having someone able to work on Ada mode who is fully
> supported rather than doing it on a volunteer basis will
> work out very well.
I really think this is the best situation. I was afraid that the
ada-mode sources would diverge, with ACT making their changes and an
official maintainer making other changes, but this has now been
resolved.
We should all be thankful that ACT is willing to actually fund the
maintenance of ada-mode. This is a really great thing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-26 0:00 Ada mode requests (Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java) bourguet
1999-01-26 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-27 0:00 ` bourguet
1999-01-27 0:00 ` John McCabe
[not found] ` <36affcb4.14065782@news.geccs.gecm.com>
1999-01-27 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-01-29 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-01-30 0:00 ` dewar
[not found] ` <36b7695a.2630918@news.geccs.gecm.com>
1999-02-02 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-02-03 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-02-04 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-02-04 0:00 ` EMACS Ada Mode Maintenance dewar
1999-02-04 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-05 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-05 0:00 ` briot
1999-02-05 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-05 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-02-05 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-02-05 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-02-05 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-05 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-02-04 0:00 ` Ada mode requests (Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java) Chris Morgan
1999-02-05 0:00 ` John McCabe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox