From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Representation Clauses for tagged types
Date: 1998/08/28
Date: 1998-08-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3yasa2gfn.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6s129l$i82$1@emperor.ssd.ray.com
d1c@striper.ssd.ray.com (Courville) writes:
> I'm trying to define a representation clause for a tagged type
> and I can't find any information about specifying where the
> "tag" goes. I wan't to do something like this:
Here is some advice: don't bother trying to write a representation
clause for a tagged type. Use the streams facility to convert your
tagged-type object to an external representation, and process that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-08-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-08-26 0:00 Representation Clauses for tagged types Courville
1998-08-26 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1998-08-28 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-08-26 0:00 tmoran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox