From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Ada 200X?
Date: 1998/07/26
Date: 1998-07-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3vhol7g8d.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6pdt77$qgo$1@news-1.news.gte.net
jlvojir1 <jlvojir1@gte.net> writes:
> I ran acrosssome articles that you have writen in the Ada news
> group. I am purchasing books on the subject and having previous
> experience with C/C++ I hope to make the conversion painlessly and join
> your elit group, but a comment you said in your letter confused me.
> Using the term "Ada 200x" I have never heard of this proposed standard
> your where you just saying that whenever the next standard appears that
> the team should add this. I want to learn the newest Ada standard, the
> notion that another standard is sneaking up just after I have invested
> money and time in this venture and then be left behind with old news.
The most recent version of Ada was approved as an international standard
in Feb 95. There is no such thing as "Ada 200x".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-07-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-07-25 0:00 Ada 200X? jlvojir1
1998-07-26 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1998-07-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-07-26 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-07-27 0:00 ` dennison
1998-07-27 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox