From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: precise floats
Date: 1998/08/07
Date: 1998-08-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3u33plo6x.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6qcoh0$3ump$1@prime.imagin.net
smize@news.imagin.net (Samuel Mize) writes:
> Assuming you want the greatest possible accuracy, perhaps best would be
>
> type my_very_precise_type is System.Max_Digits;
>
> subtype Fail_If_Not_Precise_Enough
> is my_very_precise_type digits <N>;
>
> So your variables will have the max precision available, and the
> compiler will warn you if it can't give you at least N digits.
Reduced accuracy subtypes are a deprecated feature (see RM95 J.3), so I
recommend not doing this.
Actually, it's not necessary anyway. The compiler will reject the
declaration
type Fail_If_Not_Precise_Enough is digits N;
if it can't give you at least N digits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-08-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-08-06 0:00 precise floats Robert Dewar
1998-08-06 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-06 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-08-04 0:00 Bob Fletcher
1998-08-04 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-08-04 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-08-05 0:00 ` Frank Klemm
1998-08-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-06 0:00 ` dennison
1998-08-07 0:00 ` paul.english
1998-08-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-12 0:00 ` Kevin Radke
1998-08-25 0:00 ` Gene Ouye
1998-08-10 0:00 ` dennison
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Tom Weis
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-04 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1998-08-05 0:00 ` Bob Fletcher
1998-08-04 0:00 ` Christopher Green
1998-08-05 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-08-09 0:00 ` Bob Fletcher
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox