From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Problem Compiling with GNAT
Date: 1999/03/15
Date: 1999-03-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3sob6broj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7cj6nt$rvh$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
Larry <lhazel@mindspring.com> writes:
> There is a type named Class in many packages and in one procedure the
> compiler seems to be confused about which Class is used. Here is
> abbreviated code for that procedure:
"Class" is a horrible choice for the name of a type. Why don't you just
name the type "Fire_Mission"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-15 0:00 Problem Compiling with GNAT Larry
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Larry
1999-03-16 0:00 ` fraser
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-19 0:00 ` Fraser Wilson
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Larry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox