From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Problem Compiling with GNAT
Date: 1999/03/16
Date: 1999-03-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3iuc2b4hk.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ck8pk$2co$1@remarQ.com
fraser@sinopsis.com writes:
> I tried it and didn't like it (and I didn't inhale either). However,
> what I've found lately is that the idea of defining exactly one tagged
> type in each package seems valuable. It makes packages small, and
> maintenance easier. Well, it has so far. We'll see.
For some coding ideas, you can search the ACM patterns archive starting
in Oct/Nov 98, and continuing to the present.
<http://www.acm.org/archives/patterns.html>
You can subscribe to the patterns list by sending the message (body)
subscribe patterns <your full name>
to the ACM mailing-list server.
<mailto:listserv@acm.org>
Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-15 0:00 Problem Compiling with GNAT Larry
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Larry
1999-03-16 0:00 ` fraser
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-19 0:00 ` Fraser Wilson
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Larry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox