From: Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com>
Subject: GNAT not in gcc-3.0?
Date: 09 Feb 2001 18:44:26 -0800
Date: 2001-02-09T18:44:26-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hf23uuid.fsf_-_@yakisoba.forte-intl.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Nc%g6.4$E04.287@typhoon.nyu.edu
I'd have sworn that Robert said that GNAT was going to be in gcc-3.0, but
by the looks of the official web page, it isn't:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html>
--
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084 4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-10 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-07 19:12 Searching for HP GNAT Binaries Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2001-02-07 19:42 ` Ted Dennison
2001-02-07 20:32 ` Searching for HP GNAT Binaries (found) Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2001-02-09 23:39 ` Searching for HP GNAT Binaries Richard Kenner
2001-02-10 2:44 ` Ronald Cole [this message]
2001-02-10 5:14 ` GNAT not in gcc-3.0? Robert Dewar
2001-02-07 20:26 ` Searching for HP GNAT Binaries Britt Snodgrass
2001-02-07 21:24 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox