From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: precise floats
Date: 1998/08/05
Date: 1998-08-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3g1fcmvp6.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6q7vtb$jk$1@heliodor.xara.net
"Bob Fletcher" <bob@radge.nospam.globalnet.co.uk> writes:
> What is the best way to define a float type that has greater precision,
> (like a lot greater), than the default one? Is there a simple way to do
> this?
How about
type Max_Float is digits System.Max_Digits;
Is that what you had in mind?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-08-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-08-04 0:00 precise floats Bob Fletcher
1998-08-04 0:00 ` Christopher Green
1998-08-04 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1998-08-05 0:00 ` Bob Fletcher
1998-08-04 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-08-04 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-08-05 0:00 ` Frank Klemm
1998-08-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-06 0:00 ` dennison
1998-08-07 0:00 ` paul.english
1998-08-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-12 0:00 ` Kevin Radke
1998-08-25 0:00 ` Gene Ouye
1998-08-10 0:00 ` dennison
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Tom Weis
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-05 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1998-08-09 0:00 ` Bob Fletcher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-08-06 0:00 Robert Dewar
1998-08-06 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
1998-08-06 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-08-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox