From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Where's Ada95 when OO languages are discussed?
Date: 1999/03/26
Date: 1999-03-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3d81wzqw4.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7d9rc0$ma6@drn.newsguy.com
Kevin@nospam writes:
> Java is more OO than C++ or Ada, yes.
I don't understand what you mean by "more OO." Ada95 and C++ both
support user-defined, extensible, polymorphic types that hide their
representation.
What "more" to OO is there?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-23 0:00 Where's Ada95 when OO languages are discussed? Mike Silva
1999-03-23 0:00 ` fred
1999-03-23 0:00 ` David Starner
1999-03-23 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-03-23 0:00 ` David Starner
1999-03-23 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-03-23 0:00 ` David Starner
1999-03-23 0:00 ` Kevin
1999-03-26 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-03-24 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-03-27 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1999-03-28 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-03-24 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-03-24 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-24 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1999-03-24 0:00 ` SpamSpamSpam
1999-03-24 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-24 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-03-30 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1999-03-30 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-30 0:00 ` bglbv
1999-03-30 0:00 ` dennison
1999-03-30 0:00 ` dennison
1999-03-31 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-04-13 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-03-30 0:00 ` Mike Harrison
1999-04-13 0:00 ` John McCabe
1999-03-23 0:00 ` Gautier
1999-03-24 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1999-03-25 0:00 ` SpamSpamSpam
1999-03-25 0:00 ` Bob Munck
1999-03-25 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox