From: Matthew Heaney <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Problem Compiling with GNAT
Date: 1999/03/16
Date: 1999-03-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m367815o5f.fsf@mheaney.ni.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7cl2dl$sai$1@platane.wanadoo.fr
"Jean-Pierre Rosen" <rosen.adalog@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> I agree that the notation may seem odd in isolation.
It is odd all the time, Jean-Pierre.
> Moreover (and foremost), it is the only convention I could find which
> is consistent when you use "facet" generic packages, i.e. packages
> that create new tagged types from imported ones.
Just because "it is the only convention you could find which is
consistent" does not mean that another such convention does not exist!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-03-15 0:00 Problem Compiling with GNAT Larry
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-15 0:00 ` Larry
1999-03-16 0:00 ` fraser
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-03-19 0:00 ` Fraser Wilson
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-03-16 0:00 ` Larry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox