From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Subject: Re: When to expect bugs fixed?
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 00:57:48 +0200
Date: 2014-11-02T00:57:48+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33oh9$675$1@speranza.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: lysii2h70j.fsf@pushface.org
Simon Wright wrote:
> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
>
>> generic
>> type Record_Type; -- It should be an untagged record for C
>> compatibility type Record_Type_Access is access Record_Type; -- should
>> have convention C
>> package RDF.Auxilary.Handled_Record is
>>
>> subtype Access_Type is Record_Type_Access;
>
> Or even
>
> ========================================================================
> generic
> type Record_Type; -- It should be an untagged record for C
compatibility
> type Access_Type is access Record_Type; -- should have convention C
> package RDF.Auxilary.Handled_Record is>
========================================================================
I think, this is wrong: It tempts to use Access_Type which is NOT convention
C by default!
I'll better wait for a bugfix GNAT release. I have other business not only
writing in Ada. So I can keep myself busy.
--
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-01 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-01 17:24 When to expect bugs fixed? Victor Porton
2014-11-01 17:44 ` Ludovic Brenta
2014-11-01 17:55 ` Victor Porton
2014-11-01 21:02 ` Anh Vo
2014-11-01 22:41 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-01 22:48 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-01 22:57 ` Victor Porton [this message]
2014-11-02 7:36 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-03 15:46 ` Tero Koskinen
2014-11-03 17:00 ` Luke A. Guest
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox