* /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++?
@ 2006-02-06 17:06 Martin Krischik
2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Krischik @ 2006-02-06 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi everybody.
The title allready says it all. But if you want to see for yourself:
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/05/0119223
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++?
2006-02-06 17:06 /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++? Martin Krischik
@ 2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen
2006-02-07 1:30 ` flaran
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lorenzen @ 2006-02-06 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
Martin Krischik <krischik@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
> Hi everybody.
>
> The title allready says it all. But if you want to see for yourself:
>
> http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/05/0119223
>
Yeah I saw it, but I didn't even want to start...
- Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++?
2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen
@ 2006-02-07 1:30 ` flaran
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: flaran @ 2006-02-07 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
Okay, I really want to know exactly how this relates to Ada? We aren't
here to discuss what is better than Ada. Maybe you should stick this
stuff in comp.lang.C++ or not at all.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-07 1:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-06 17:06 /. Ultra-Stable Software Design in C++? Martin Krischik
2006-02-06 19:25 ` Mark Lorenzen
2006-02-07 1:30 ` flaran
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox