From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: type access Parent'Class
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:27:50 +0000
Date: 2011-11-22T13:27:50+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2zkfo8ey1.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4ecb7463$0$6643$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net
Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> writes:
> Right now I am seeing, again, what it means to rewrite portions of a
> program when there is no static type system (and no parameter naming).
I can see your point if you mean no parameter _typing_ ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-21 19:03 type access Parent'Class Yukicanis
2011-11-21 19:25 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-11-21 19:40 ` Yukicanis
2011-11-21 19:45 ` Robert A Duff
2011-11-21 19:46 ` Yukicanis
2011-11-21 23:45 ` Gene
2011-11-22 8:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-11-22 10:07 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-11-22 13:27 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2011-11-22 16:13 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-11-21 19:33 ` Robert A Duff
2011-11-21 19:44 ` Yukicanis
2011-11-24 10:33 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-11-24 11:18 ` Yukicanis
2011-11-21 21:09 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox