From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Warnings about hiding
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 20:11:50 +0100
Date: 2010-10-09T20:11:50+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2y6a7i3k9.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: i8pj2b$2gsj$1@news.ett.com.ua
anon@anon.org writes:
> So, drop the requirement of using "-gnatwh" is the only answer.
> Unless you want or need to see what caused the first routine or
> variable to be hidden.
In similar vein I use -gnatwaL because I don't want to know about all
the elaboration-order checks one might need if not using GNAT's static
elaboration.
On the other hand, I really would have thought that an overriding
subprogram shouldn't provoke the warning...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-09 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-08 12:47 Warnings about hiding Julian Leyh
2010-10-08 19:46 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-10-08 20:24 ` Simon Wright
2010-10-09 1:31 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2010-10-09 6:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2010-10-09 8:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-10-26 1:34 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-10-26 1:28 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-10-09 11:18 ` anon
2010-10-09 19:11 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2010-10-09 20:11 ` anon
2010-10-26 1:16 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2010-10-26 9:32 ` J-P. Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox