From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: S'Is_nan or S'Is_inf?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 07:24:52 +0100
Date: 2010-07-17T07:24:52+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2tynytykr.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Xns9DB7BD155A072WarrensBlatherings@81.169.183.62
Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com> writes:
> To detect NaN then, this seems to work:
See above, where Jean-Pierre said
> If X /= X, then X is a NaN (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NaN)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-17 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-15 21:00 S'Is_nan or S'Is_inf? Warren
2010-07-15 21:30 ` Rod Chapman
2010-07-15 22:03 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-15 21:42 ` J-P. Rosen
2010-07-15 22:07 ` Simon Wright
2010-07-16 8:42 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-07-16 17:06 ` Warren
2010-07-16 19:39 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-07-16 22:35 ` Warren
2010-07-17 6:24 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2010-07-19 17:04 ` Warren
2010-07-17 7:40 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-07-19 17:18 ` Warren
2010-07-19 23:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2010-07-20 14:12 ` Warren
2010-07-20 16:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox