From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Arctan: to use with single or with double arguments?
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:29:57 +0000
Date: 2012-02-11T15:29:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2sjih2xsa.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: e687953c-d5a3-42e5-9b7b-1529ed38153c@n12g2000yqb.googlegroups.com
AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de> writes:
> It's a severe bug to use positional association for Arctan!
Only a bug if you get it wrong. Otherwise it's a meta-bug.
Not sure that Arctan (Y => X, X => Y) is exactly _clear_.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-11 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-24 21:32 Arctan: to use with single or with double arguments? Ada novice
2010-09-24 21:55 ` Jeffrey Carter
2010-09-25 8:44 ` Ada novice
2010-09-25 17:31 ` Jeffrey Carter
2010-09-25 21:34 ` Ada novice
2010-09-26 4:02 ` jpwoodruff
2010-09-26 8:21 ` Ada novice
2010-09-26 7:31 ` Jeffrey Carter
2010-09-26 8:24 ` Ada novice
2012-02-11 0:26 ` Jack Mitchell
2012-02-11 1:11 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-02-11 8:53 ` Simon Wright
2012-02-11 10:46 ` AdaMagica
2012-02-11 15:29 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2012-02-11 16:21 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-02-11 16:47 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox