Re: GNAT 4.4.5 order of conditional processing?

[Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>]

awdorrin <awdorrin@gmail.com> writes:

> In this case, the short-circuit logic is necessary based on how the
> code has been structured.
>
> The first conditional, is to see if the simulation is done being
> initialized, the second and third conditionals are variables that
> won't be initialized with valid values until the initialization is
> complete.
>
> Before anyone jumps in to comment on how bad this approach is, I
> already know ;) but I'm dealing with porting code originally written
> 20 years ago. First step is to get it functional, second step is to
> fix/update it. :-)

I for one don't think it's bad; it's the way the problem is.