From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Switching to a more recent compiler.
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:01:46 +0100
Date: 2012-04-03T09:01:46+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2obr9i6qd.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5b9ada16-1174-4a73-9117-9a16e7de806a@z38g2000vbu.googlegroups.com
Gautier write-only <gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com> writes:
> On 30 mar, 00:12, austin.oby...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> What I need to know from some young blood in the know is this, “will
>> my stuff run straight off in a revised compiler like say Ada-2005
>> without some editing.
>
> There is a very high probability it will, provided you don't use
> identifiers that have become keywords in Ada 2005: "interface",
> "overriding", "synchronized".
And even then, (with GNAT), you can use the -gnat95 flag to retain the
older language model. You still get warnings.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-03 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-29 22:12 Switching to a more recent compiler austin.obyrne
2012-03-29 22:30 ` Shark8
2012-03-29 22:51 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-03-29 23:07 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-03-30 13:26 ` austin.obyrne
2012-03-30 13:29 ` austin.obyrne
2012-04-03 0:56 ` Gautier write-only
2012-04-03 8:01 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox