From: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Subject: Seemingly wierd conversion for in out parameter
Date: 1998/02/20
Date: 1998-02-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2lnv6zsld.fsf@wf-rch.cirr.com> (raw)
I've been playing with some techniques with derived types and I ran
across a rather unusual things. The following program:
with Text_IO; use Text_IO;
with Ada.Tags; use Ada.Tags;
------------------------------------------------------------------------
procedure Tester is
type Base is abstract tagged null record;
type Base_Class is access all Base'Class;
type Der1 is new Base with null record;
type Der1_Class is access all Der1'Class;
type Der2 is new Base with null record;
type Der2_Class is access all Der2'Class;
procedure Process (Var : in out Base_Class) is
begin
Var := new Der2;
end Process;
V1 : Der1_Class := new Der1;
-- This will be a compile error.
-- U1 : Der1_Class := new Der2;
begin
Put_Line("Base tag = " & Expanded_Name(Base'Tag));
Put_Line("Der1 tag = " & Expanded_Name(Der1'Tag));
Put_Line("Der2 tag = " & Expanded_Name(Der2'Tag));
Put_Line("V1 tag = " & Expanded_Name(V1'Tag));
Process(Base_Class(V1));
Put_Line("V1 tag = " & Expanded_Name(V1'Tag));
end Tester;
------------------------------------------------------------------------
will compile and produce the following output:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Base tag = TESTER.BASE
Der1 tag = TESTER.DER1
Der2 tag = TESTER.DER2
V1 tag = TESTER.DER1
V1 tag = TESTER.DER2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As you can see, the variable V1 should not be able to reference a
tagged type of Der2, but this program does that without any errors
under GNAT (the only compiler I have right now). I would think that
the compiler wouldn't allow a class conversion passed to an in out
parameter, but it seems to.
I'm certainly no language lawyer, but I would image that doing a cast
would make something not a "variable" any more (RM 6.4.1(5)), thus
this would not be legal. Is GNAT wrong, or is this legal, or is this
a grey area?
Thanks,
--
Corey Minyard Internet: minyard@acm.org
Work: minyard@nortel.ca UUCP: minyard@wf-rch.cirr.com
next reply other threads:[~1998-02-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-02-20 0:00 Corey Minyard [this message]
1998-02-23 0:00 ` Seemingly wierd conversion for in out parameter Albert K. Lee
1998-02-23 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1998-02-25 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1998-02-26 0:00 ` Bernd Holzmueller
1998-02-26 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1998-02-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox