From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ?
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:09:47 +0100
Date: 2012-07-10T12:09:47+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2liirzxc4.fsf@nidhoggr.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 48efa098-30ee-473d-af17-8de323a54967@googlegroups.com
Rod Kay <rodakay@internode.on.net> writes:
> Also, it seems I managed to introduce a different error in my (not
> so) cut-down version of the code (ie deriving types within a body,
> rather than spec), which Dmitri pointed out. Would two bug reports be
> in order then ?
Yes. They may well be caused by different compiler issues.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-10 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-08 3:02 Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ? rodakay
2012-07-08 6:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-08 7:38 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-07-08 8:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-08 12:34 ` rodakay
2012-07-09 6:53 ` rodakay
2012-07-09 7:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-09 7:46 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-09 9:37 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-09 9:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-09 17:32 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-09 18:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-13 15:58 ` Robert A Duff
2012-07-08 17:41 ` Vadim Godunko
2012-07-09 7:34 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-08 23:45 ` sbelmont700
2012-07-10 7:02 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-10 11:09 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox