From: kingdon@harvey.cyclic.com (Jim Kingdon)
Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
Date: 1996/06/11
Date: 1996-06-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2ivcyxydf.fsf@harvey.cyclic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4mq7mg$8hs@jake.probe.net
> The "mandate" is under review, but that's a LONG way from "has been
> lifted", and it's _definitely_ not the way I would bet.
> More info can be found at: http://www2.nas.edu/cstbweb/21b6.html
I agree. One can usually make a pretty good guess about what this
sort of committee will say by looking at who is on it. And I noticed
quite a few Ada people listed. Ergo.....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-05-08 0:00 Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Howard Dodson
1996-05-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
[not found] ` <31913863.446B9B3D@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-05-13 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-05-13 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-05-14 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-05-14 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-05-17 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-05-08 0:00 ` Thomas C. Timberlake
1996-05-08 0:00 ` David Weller
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Roy M. Bell
1996-06-09 0:00 ` Peggy Byers
1996-06-09 0:00 ` David Weller
1996-06-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-10 0:00 ` Paul Whittington
1996-06-10 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-10 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-06-10 0:00 ` James Krell
1996-06-11 0:00 ` Michael Levasseur
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Michael Levasseur
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-17 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-20 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-06-25 0:00 ` Bob Kitzberger
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-11 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-11 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon [this message]
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Tom Robinson
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Tom Robinson
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-18 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-18 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Carl Bowman
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Tom Robinson
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
[not found] ` <31DD5234.11CB@thomsoft.com>
1996-07-18 0:00 ` Front Ends (was: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?) Tom Robinson
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Jon S Anthony
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
1996-06-21 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-19 0:00 ` Front Ends (was: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?) Jon S Anthony
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-06-14 0:00 Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Mark Bell
1996-06-14 0:00 Mark Bell
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Kevin J. Weise
1996-06-17 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-18 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Michael Levasseur
1996-06-17 0:00 Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93
1996-06-19 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-19 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
1996-06-21 0:00 Bob Crispen
1996-06-25 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-06-25 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1996-06-27 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-06-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-01 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-27 0:00 ` Bob Crispen
1996-06-27 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
1996-06-28 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Nasser Abbasi
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Bob Kitzberger
1996-07-10 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-07-10 0:00 ` David Emery
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Brad Balfour
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Jim Chelini
1996-07-22 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-07-11 0:00 ` James Rhodes
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Ronald Cole
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
[not found] <nhd91w250f.fsf@paralysys>
1996-07-16 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox