From: Simon Wright <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Subject: Re: System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:07:50 +0100
Date: 2007-05-31T21:07:50+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2ira8lpt5.fsf@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1180623520.303981.191090@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com
Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com> writes:
> In other words - the focus for evaluation should go elsewhere.
> Performance? Maintainability? Some other factors?
Our compiler is GNAT, and we develop and unit test on Windows, the
target is VxWorks on PowerPC.
We decided that GNAT.Sockets was perfectly OK for our needs (that
doesn't mean we think it's perfect) and that we had enough to do
developing our application without doing a socket library as well.
AdaSockets wasn't really an option given that GNAT already has a
library. It would have been yet another library to justify to the
technical authority.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-31 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 14:58 System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings Maciej Sobczak
2007-05-31 15:06 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-05-31 15:23 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-05-31 16:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-05-31 19:08 ` Michael Bode
2007-05-31 19:48 ` Markus E Leypold
2007-05-31 20:07 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2007-05-31 21:10 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-06-01 19:50 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 6:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-01 19:29 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 6:59 ` anon
2007-06-01 10:17 ` Markus E Leypold
2007-06-01 13:01 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-01 20:13 ` Pascal Obry
2007-06-01 20:35 ` Pascal Obry
2007-06-01 17:42 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-06-01 19:32 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 20:45 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-02 5:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox