comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cm@mihalis.demon.co.uk (Chris Morgan)
Subject: Re: Dec Ditching Ada?
Date: 1996/09/11
Date: 1996-09-11T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2hgp4om0y.fsf@mihalis.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.841979749@schonberg



In article <513a9r$10na@ilx018.iil.intel.com> Uri Raz
<uraz@iil.intel.com> writes:

      I doesnt seem to me like the issue is anything about who owns the compiler,
     whether payments goes for support or developement, or anything the like.

      The issue is about two questions :
       1. Is the GNAT a good Ada compiler ? (= is software X worthy of use ?)
       2. Does support give the bang for the bucks, and will continue to do
	  so in the future ?

      As the first question is ignored in this thread, I think it boils down to
     the second - would GNAT users get their money's worth of support or not.


Well as one user who has a support contract I am qualified to offer my
experience as answers to both questions.

1. Is GNAT a good Ada compiler?

Yes. If I were to use words and phrases such as "best", "fast",
"bullet-proof" need more evidence, but I think everyone agrees that
GNAT is a very good Ada compiler. In fact all the Ada95 compilers look
like being very good - better than the ones I have had to use for many
years in fact.

2. Does support give bang for the bucks

We think so.

2. ... and will continue to do so.

Who knows? Can't say whether IBM will be around in "the future" let
alone small companies like ACT (or mine for that matter).

Chris
--
cm@mihalis.demon.co.uk	Team Ada




  parent reply	other threads:[~1996-09-11  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1996-08-22  0:00 Dec Ditching Ada? Charlie Cole
1996-08-22  0:00 ` Brian & Karen Bell
1996-08-22  0:00 ` Howard W. LUDWIG
1996-08-25  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-22  0:00 ` James Squire
1996-08-24  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-26  0:00     ` James Squire
1996-09-04  0:00       ` Uri Raz
1996-09-05  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-05  0:00         ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-05  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-06  0:00             ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-06  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-07  0:00                 ` Use of the term "commercial" (was "Dec Ditching Ada?") Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-07  0:00               ` Dec Ditching Ada? Richard Kenner
1996-09-07  0:00                 ` Dennison
1996-09-07  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-07  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
1996-09-10  0:00                       ` Uri Raz
1996-09-11  0:00                         ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-12  0:00                         ` Jon S Anthony
1996-09-16  0:00                         ` Charlie McCutcheon
1996-09-17  0:00                           ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-09-10  0:00             ` Chris Morgan
1996-09-11  0:00             ` Chris Morgan [this message]
1996-09-12  0:00               ` Richard Kenner
1996-09-12  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-22  0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1996-08-23  0:00   ` Douglas Rupp
1996-08-24  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-23  0:00 ` Charlie McCutcheon
1996-08-23  0:00 ` Klaus Wyss
1996-08-23  0:00 ` Charlie McCutcheon
1996-08-25  0:00 ` Brendan Boulter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-08-23  0:00 Alain Graziani
1996-08-25  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-08-26  0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-08-27  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox