From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Subject: Re: Sending Variable Length Messages with GNAT.Sockets
Date: 12 May 2005 12:24:09 +0200
Date: 2005-05-12T12:24:09+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2hdh8214m.fsf@hugin.crs4.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2ll6ljwwd.fsf@grendel.local
Simon Wright wrote:
> On our side there's quite a lot of generated code to cope with
> mapping Booleans to packed arrays of bits, driven by UML tags in the
> models, but once the data is in the 32-bit form we do indeed use
> Streams.
Why not use representation clauses for doing those mappings? (or is
the generated code actually mostly generated representation clauses?)
Jacob
--
"It ain't rocket science!"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-12 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-09 10:11 Sending Variable Length Messages with GNAT.Sockets markp
2005-05-09 10:39 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-05-09 11:19 ` markp
2005-05-09 11:50 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-05-09 14:30 ` John B. Matthews
2005-05-09 14:51 ` markp
2005-05-09 18:49 ` Adrien Plisson
2005-05-09 19:16 ` Simon Wright
2005-05-10 15:08 ` markp
2005-05-10 20:34 ` Simon Wright
2005-05-11 13:19 ` Marc A. Criley
2005-05-11 17:14 ` tmoran
2005-05-11 21:05 ` Simon Wright
2005-05-12 10:24 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen [this message]
2005-05-14 11:12 ` Simon Wright
2005-05-09 11:19 ` Jeff C
2005-05-09 11:35 ` markp
2005-05-09 11:57 ` Adrien Plisson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox