From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Passing Ada Proc as a C Function Pointer
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:46:00 +0100
Date: 2010-08-04T20:46:00+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2bp9i9n5z.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bc887840-ef75-405a-8019-8e44552a92d3@i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com
I would be a bit worried about Thread_Proc's *Ada* environment. There's
this thing called the Secondary Stack, used for - for example - string
catenation; and it's not set up here.
I think you'll be OK so long as you restrain yourself! Twiddling LEDs
should be OK.
There may be a pragma to prevent secondary stack usage?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-04 16:40 Passing Ada Proc as a C Function Pointer Warren
2010-08-04 17:14 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-08-05 0:24 ` Warren
2010-08-04 18:46 ` Jeffrey Carter
2010-08-04 19:36 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-08-05 0:42 ` Warren
2010-08-05 0:55 ` Warren
2010-08-04 19:46 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2010-08-05 0:45 ` Warren
2010-08-05 7:33 ` Rolf
2010-08-05 20:50 ` Simon Wright
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-05 14:31 Warren
2010-08-05 15:37 ` Warren
2010-08-05 16:51 ` Warren
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox