From: Simon Wright <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Subject: Re: System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 20:32:32 +0100
Date: 2007-06-01T20:32:32+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2abvjlbcf.fsf@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gUY7i.143046$_c5.113755@attbi_s22
"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@acm.nospam.org> writes:
> In the absence of such a library, but given the existence of an
> existing library such as GNAT's, I'd probably choose the existing
> library, but would add a wrapper around it in case I need to use
> another compiler.
I suppose that depends on the licence of the GNAT library and on
whether it depends on GNAT-specific features (pragmas, etc) in any
important way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-01 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-31 14:58 System calls - GNAT library vs. direct bindings Maciej Sobczak
2007-05-31 15:06 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-05-31 15:23 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-05-31 16:14 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-05-31 19:08 ` Michael Bode
2007-05-31 19:48 ` Markus E Leypold
2007-05-31 20:07 ` Simon Wright
2007-05-31 21:10 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-06-01 19:50 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 6:27 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-01 19:29 ` Simon Wright
2007-06-01 6:59 ` anon
2007-06-01 10:17 ` Markus E Leypold
2007-06-01 13:01 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-01 20:13 ` Pascal Obry
2007-06-01 20:35 ` Pascal Obry
2007-06-01 17:42 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-06-01 19:32 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2007-06-01 20:45 ` Maciej Sobczak
2007-06-02 5:35 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox