From: Simon Wright <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT.Sockets: Timeval_Duration is in milliseconds?
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:13:56 +0000
Date: 2007-12-13T13:13:56+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m28x3yhh4b.fsf@mac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9de762a3-bac6-4295-b321-3e8091baf28d@d27g2000prf.googlegroups.com
gpriv@axonx.com writes:
> On Dec 11, 3:33 pm, Simon Wright <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:
>> gp...@axonx.com writes:
>> > Yep, it worked:
>>
>> > ..done with EXPIRED after 4.999302724
>>
>> So GNAT GPL 2007 handles _this_ call right -- which functionality was
>> it you had the problem with? Do you have a test case?
>
>
> Linux update:
>
> Timeout value is in seconds here. So it is only a Windows problem as
> to be expected.
Looking at http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms740141.aspx it
turns out that the Windows version of select(2) uses a struct timeval*
-- so not surprising that it behaves as we were expecting. Huh.
--S
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-13 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-08 19:45 GNAT.Sockets: Timeval_Duration is in milliseconds? gpriv
2007-12-08 22:11 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-08 22:34 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 1:45 ` tmoran
2007-12-09 9:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 12:50 ` Gautier
2007-12-09 13:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 14:59 ` Martin Krischik
2007-12-09 17:24 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 15:55 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 17:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-12-09 18:26 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-09 19:36 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 22:51 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-09 23:27 ` gpriv
2007-12-10 20:06 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-10 21:02 ` gpriv
2007-12-11 20:33 ` Simon Wright
2007-12-13 3:44 ` gpriv
2007-12-13 13:13 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2007-12-13 14:32 ` gpriv
2007-12-09 19:46 ` tmoran
2007-12-09 9:01 ` Martin Krischik
2007-12-09 9:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox